Austin v. Howard
Austin v. Howard
Opinion of the Court
Order reversed, without costs, and the matter remitted to Special Term for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: As stated by the dissenters at the Appellate Division, the findings and recommendations of the “ arbitrator ” were entitled to consideration by the Commissioner even if not entitled to the weight assigned by the law to an arbitrator’s award, and should not have been ignored by the Commissioner as he apparently did when he made Ms determination (see Matter of Kelly v. Murphy, 20 N Y 2d 205). Accordingly, the matter should be remitted to Special Term with directions to remand the matter to the Commissioner for reconsideration
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Breitel, Jasen, Jones and Wachtler. Taking no part: Judge Gabrielli.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.