New York Court of Appeals, 1974

MATTER OF WROBLEWSKI v. Ricotta

MATTER OF WROBLEWSKI v. Ricotta
New York Court of Appeals · Decided October 23, 1974 · Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Rabin and Stevens Concur in Per Curiam Opinion
35 N.Y.2d 745; 320 N.E.2d 647; 361 N.Y.S.2d 913; 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1248

MATTER OF WROBLEWSKI v. Ricotta

Opinion

*746 Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed (see Matter of Paciona v. Marshall, 35 N Y 2d 289). We would also note that the petitioner made a timely motion to dismiss the indictment allege ing illegality of the jury selection process. Appellate review of a denial of that motion, if available at all, would only be on direct appeal from a judgment of conviction if one ensued. (CPL 470.15, subd. 1; CPLR 7801, subd. 1; cf. People v. Chestnut, 26 N Y 2d 481.)

Chief Judge Bbeitel and Judges Jasen, Gabkielli, Jones, Wachtleb, Rabin and Stevens concur in Per Curiam opinion.

Judgment affirmed, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.