New York Court of Appeals, 1975

Dye v. Lincoln First Bank

Dye v. Lincoln First Bank
New York Court of Appeals · Decided December 4, 1975
38 N.Y.2d 769; 344 N.E.2d 57; 381 N.Y.S.2d 228; 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2373

Dye v. Lincoln First Bank

Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. Order affirmed, with costs, on the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Appellate Division and because the prior grant of summary judgment, the "procedural equivalent of a trial” (Falk v Goodman, 7 NY2d 87, 91), is a binding final judgment on the merits which bars a subsequent action between the same parties for the same cause of action (Eidelberg v Zellermayer, 5 AD2d 658, 662-663, affd 6 NY2d 815; see, also, Klein v Gruss & Son, 18 AD2d 1085; Riley v Southern Transp. Co., 278 App Div 605; 6 Carmody-Wait, 2d, NY Practice, § 39:39, p 492).

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.