Mascaro v. State
Mascaro v. State
38 N.Y.2d 870; 346 N.E.2d 543; 382 N.Y.S.2d 742; 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2318
Mascaro v. State
Opinion
Memorandum. There was insufficient proof in this case on which to posit a finding that there was a duty on the part of the State to maintain the curb in issue here. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the Appellate Division. Our disposition makes it unnecessary to decide between the Court of Claims’ and the Appellate Division’s findings of fact on the issues of negligence and notice.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.