New York Court of Appeals, 1976

People v. Andrus

People v. Andrus
New York Court of Appeals · Decided February 26, 1976
38 N.Y.2d 925; 346 N.E.2d 820; 382 N.Y.S.2d 981; 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2365

People v. Andrus

Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order should be affirmed.

Of the three elements required to be corroborated under the rigid requirements of the rape statute (former Penal Law, § 130.15), which prevailed at the time the defendant was convicted (see People v Linzy, 31 NY2d 99, 100-101), two of them, penetration and identity, were conceded. The third, "force or lack of consent” (at p 101) was supported by a legally competent, though equivocal, admission sufficient to create a question of fact (United States v Picarelli, 148 F2d 997, 998).

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed in memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.