Berry v. Dodd
New York Court of Appeals
Berry v. Dodd, 38 N.Y.2d 995 (N.Y. 1976)
348 N.E.2d 914; 384 N.Y.S.2d 438; 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2634
Cooke, Fuchsberg, Jasen
Berry v. Dodd
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting). We believe that in each of these cases there has been substantial compliance with the provisions of the Election Law and, accordingly, the judgment should be reversed and the petitions validated. (Cf. Matter of Rutter v Coveney, 38 NY2d 993, dissenting memorandum.)
Order affirmed.
Opinion of the Court
In each case: Order affirmed, without costs (Matter of Sciarra v Donnelly, 34 NY2d 970; Matter of Chine v Hayduk, 34 NY2d 965).
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Gabrielli, Jones and Wachtler. Judges Jasen, Fuchsberg and Cooke dissent and vote to reverse in the following memorandum.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- In the Matter of John A. Berry v. Isabel R. Dodd, Constituting the Board of Elections of the County of Nassau, and Raymond Simon, Respondents In the Matter of Barbara Honig v. Board of Elections of Nassau County, and Michael H. Greenberg
- Cited By
- 16 cases
- Status
- Published