New York Court of Appeals, 1976

People v. Graham

People v. Graham
New York Court of Appeals · Decided April 29, 1976
39 N.Y.2d 775; 350 N.E.2d 408; 385 N.Y.S.2d 31; 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2720
People v. Graham

Cases that cite this one

12 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. Order affirmed on the majority memorandum at the Appellate Division with respect to the issues there covered. Concerning the admissibility of the testimony of the robbery victim and his daughter, it has been settled within reasonable perimeters that the testimony of a live witness is not necessarily excludible because the identity of the witness had been ascertained by a breach of the rules governing search and seizure (see, generally, People v Mendez, 28 NY2d 94 [ Gibson, J.], and the authorities cited, cert den 404 US 911).

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.