New York Court of Appeals, 1976

Cataldo v. Buglass

Cataldo v. Buglass
New York Court of Appeals · Decided May 4, 1976
39 N.Y.2d 807; 351 N.E.2d 428; 385 N.Y.S.2d 761; 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2752

Cataldo v. Buglass

Opinion of the Court

Motion dismissed, with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements to respondent Johnson & Higgins, Inc., upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from involves *808a question of discretion of the type not reviewable by the Court of Appeals.

Cross application granted and appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from involves a question of discretion of the type not reviewable by the Court of Appeals.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.