Benigno v. Cohalan
Benigno v. Cohalan
Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
As noted by the Appellate Division, in consequence of failure of publication as required by section 265 of the Town
Appellant has, however, been restored to his former position because, as we are informed, the town board has executed a release of the declaration of covenants and restrictions recorded by him in anticipation of an effective zoning ordinance.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.