New York Court of Appeals, 1976

People v. Rarback

People v. Rarback
New York Court of Appeals · Decided November 16, 1976
40 N.Y.2d 922; 358 N.E.2d 267; 389 N.Y.S.2d 574; 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3091
People v. Rarback

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order at the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Notwithstanding the extended over-all elapsed time, all the circumstances in this somewhat unusual case, including, inter alia, the protracted pendency of appeals in directly related cases involving the admissibility in this case of crucial evidence, properly moved the courts below to conclude that this defendant was not denied his constitutional or statutory right to a speedy trial.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.