MATTER OF HAWTHORNE v. Peartrees, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- Claim of Ronda v. Edenwald Contracting (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- Muller v. Frankenburg-Rich Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- Rackley v. County of Rensselaer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
- Claim of Fletcher v. Ray Weil Chevrolet Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- Levine v. United Parcel Service (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- Claim of Hopkins v. Players' Three, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- Claim of McCabe v. Peconic Ambulance & Supplies, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- Claim of Scollo v. Joseph J. Pietrafesa Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- Claim of Konstantinakos v. Plaza Hotel (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
- Claim of Celli v. New York Telephone Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1978)
- Claim of Pollack v. Lingerie (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1978)
- Claim of Nudo v. Nudo Bros. Equipment Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1978)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Claim of David L. Hawthorne, as Administrator of The Estate of Frederick Hawthorne, Deceased, Respondent,
v.
Peartrees, Inc., et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Philip J. Caputo for Peartrees, Inc., and another, appellants.
William F. Fischer, Jr., and Martin Krutzel for O'Keefe Auto Service Corporation and another, appellants.
David Hirschhorn for David L. Hawthorne, respondent.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Morris N. Lissauer, Ruth Kessler Toch and Daniel Polansky of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.
Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (56 AD2d 961).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.