Nik-O-Lok Co. v. Carey
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re Ventura (New York Supreme Court 1981)
- City of Albany v. Lee (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1980)
- Frank v. State (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1978)
- Katz v. Shapiro (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1978)
- Cary v. Cary (New York Supreme Court 1978)
- Health Insurance Ass'n of America v. Harnett (New York Supreme Court 1977)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. Despite cogent arguments addressed to the wisdom and desirability of the instant legislation, there is no question that the State has the power to prohibit or regulate the commercialization of toilet facilities. For analysis of some of the particular issues of unconstitutionality urged on grounds of due process of the law and equal protection of the laws, see opinion of Mr. Justice T. Paul Kane at the Appellate Division in Nik-O-Lok v Carey (52 AD2d 375).
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.
In Nik-O-Lok v Carey: Order affirmed, with costs.
In Tads Enterprises v Carey: Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.