People v. Coleman
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Rr Village Association, Inc., Jay Stanleigh and Authur L. Penzel, Plaintiffs v. Denver Sewer Corporation and Town of Roxbury (New York) (2d Cir. 1987)
- Furlong v. Shalala (2d Cir. 1998)
- Furlong v. Shalala (2d Cir. 1998)
- Martz v. Incorporated Village Of Valley Stream (2d Cir. 1994)
- Martz v. Incorporated Village of Valley Stream (2d Cir. 1994)
- Sutphin Pharmacy, Inc. v. Perales (District Court, S.D. New York 1991)
- Oberlander v. Perales (2d Cir. 1984)
- ANDREW H. BY IRENE H. v. Ambach (District Court, N.D. New York 1984)
- People v. Wise (New York County Courts 1978)
- People v. White (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1977)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
While the conduct of the Trial Judge cannot be described as commendable, in our view neither were his intrusions (to the extent that protest was made, expressly or by reasonable implication) such as to work a denial of defendant’s right to a fair trial. Nor is there any substance to defendant’s claim that subdivision 4 of section 160.15 of the Penal Law is unconstitutional (People v Clark, 41 NY2d 612). We have examined defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.