New York Court of Appeals, 1977

Pilat v. Sachs

Pilat v. Sachs
New York Court of Appeals · Decided August 31, 1977
42 N.Y.2d 984; 368 N.E.2d 31; 398 N.Y.S.2d 409; 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2308

Pilat v. Sachs

Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The courts below considered the question of permeation of fraud and irregularities, usually a question of fact, and resolved in each instance this question in respondents’ favor. (Matter of Ruiz v McKenna, 40 NY2d 815.) Consequently, the designating petition must be sustained and the order of the Appellate Division affirmed.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.