Pilat v. Sachs

New York Court of Appeals
Pilat v. Sachs, 42 N.Y.2d 984 (N.Y. 1977)
368 N.E.2d 31; 398 N.Y.S.2d 409; 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2308

Pilat v. Sachs

Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The courts below considered the question of permeation of fraud and irregularities, usually a question of fact, and resolved in each instance this question in respondents’ favor. (Matter of Ruiz v McKenna, 40 NY2d 815.) Consequently, the designating petition must be sustained and the order of the Appellate Division affirmed.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Reference

Full Case Name
In the Matter of Oliver Pilat v. Alice Sachs, Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, and Mario M. Cuomo
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published