Guion v. Associated Dry Goods Corp.
Cases that cite this one
19 later published cases cite this decision.
- Raysor v. Port Authority Of New York And New Jersey (2d Cir. 1985)
- Raysor v. Port Authority (2d Cir. 1985)
- McFarland v. Skaggs Companies, Inc. (Utah 1984)
- Gallegos v. Elite Model Mgmt. Corp. (New York Supreme Court, New York County 2004)
- Cohn v. Meyers (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- Nelson v. Times Square Stores Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- Wieder v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
- Miller v. State (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- Miller v. State (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- Landow v. Town of Amherst (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- Garcia v. O'Keefe (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- Lynskey v. Bailey (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- Lehoczky v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- Girardi v. Community Hospital of Brooklyn (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
- O'Donnell v. K-Mart Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- Dabbs v. State of New York (N.Y. 1983)
- Morrello v. Saratoga Harness Racing, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1980)
- Varriale v. Saratoga Harness Racing, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1980)
- Williams v. City of Buffalo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1979)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order affirmed, with costs.
On the record before us there is no predicate for punitive damages as a matter of law. Even assuming that the security
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.