New York Court of Appeals, 1978

Puro v. Puro

New York Court of Appeals · Decided July 11, 1978

45 N.Y.2d 723; 380 N.E.2d 329; 408 N.Y.S.2d 503; 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2184

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Puro v. Puro (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1981)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified by denying the cross motion for summary judgment, without costs.

On the first appeal, where Arthur Puro alone appealed (33 NY2d 802), we simply held, as had Mr. Justice Fraiman (75 Misc 2d 950, 955, 956), that the acceptance of the stock option *725made by Louis Puro, on Arthur Puro’s behalf, was valid under the partnership agreement. We did not have before us, and did not consider, whether any of the acceptances sent by the other Puro brothers, satisfied the requirements of the partnership agreement or the 1963 and 1965 agreements relating to the real estate. Thus with respect to the fourth cause of action, relating only to the real estate, neither plaintiff nor defendants were entitled to summary judgment on the law of the case theory. The validity of the acceptances under the 1963 and 1965 real estate agreements must be determined on the merits.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order, insofar as appealed from, modified, without costs, in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.