New York Court of Appeals, 1978

Sheldon v. Sperber

Sheldon v. Sperber
New York Court of Appeals · Decided September 1, 1978
45 N.Y.2d 788; 381 N.E.2d 159; 409 N.Y.S.2d 1; 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2220
Sheldon v. Sperber

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*789OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division.

The unsworn statement of a subscribing witness to a designating petition is a formal act requiring compliance with prescribed statutory procedure. Section 6-132 of the Election Law mandates that, preceding his or her signature, a subscribing witness state his or her name, party enrollment, residence, election district, ward or assembly district, city or town, county, the number of signatures witnessed and the date. The addition of this information subsequent to the signature of the subscribing witness by another in the witness’ absence is a nullity, rendering the witnessed signatures invalid. (E.g., Matter of Anderson v Power, 1 AD2d 603, affd 1 NY2d 868.)

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.