New York Court of Appeals, 1978

In re the Arbitration between Richard Spychalski & Continental Insurance Companies

In re the Arbitration between Richard Spychalski & Continental Insurance Companies
New York Court of Appeals · Decided October 19, 1978
45 N.Y.2d 847; 410 N.Y.S.2d 65; 382 N.E.2d 765; 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2273
In re the Arbitration between Richard Spychalski & Continental Insurance Companies

Cases that cite this one

28 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

*849Appellant insurer is precluded from seeking a judicial stay of arbitration inasmuch as its application therefor was not properly served within the 20 days prescribed by statute (CPLR 7503, subd [c]). Additionally the payment by Utica Mutual Insurance Company of the full $10,000 under the standard New York uninsured motorist indorsement, while relevant to the consideration and determination of the claims of the parties by the arbitrator, is unrelated to appellant’s commitment to submit such claims to arbitration. Finally, we think it impermissible for us to express any view as to "whether the claim with respect to which arbitration is sought is tenable, or otherwise pass upon the merits of the dispute”. (CPLR 7501.)

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.