Board of Supervisors v. Aulisi
Cases that cite this one
16 later published cases cite this decision.
- Holtzman v. Hellenbrand (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- Soares v. Herrick (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- In re Rice (New York Supreme Court 2011)
- McNamara v. Tormey (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- People v. Rocci (Utica City Court 2000)
- Cloke v. Pulver (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
- Haggerty v. Himelein (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- Johnson v. Collins (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- People v. Leahy (N.Y. 1988)
- People v. Schongar (New York County Courts 1988)
- People v. Gallagher (New York Supreme Court 1988)
- Relin v. Celli (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- Murphy v. Dwyer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- Schumer v. Holtzman (N.Y. 1983)
- Schumer v. Holtzman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
- Agresta v. Roberts (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1978)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Judgment of the Appellate Division affirmed, without costs, on the opinion of Mr. Justice T. Paul Kane at the Appellate Division. It is noted additionally that a new District Attorney has been elected in the County of Montgomery to take office on January 1, 1979. These events will moot the necessity for displacing the regularly elected District Attorney based on whatever disqualification has arisen because of past associations and activity or omissions. Should the problem which gave occasion to the designation invalidated in this proceeding recur, recourse, if supported by a proper basis, may be had to the Governor of the State for action in accordance with his powers under the State Constitution (art XIII, § 13) and subdivision 2 of section 63 of the Executive Law.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fushsberg and Cooke concur.
Judgment affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.