People v. Dairsaw
Cases that cite this one
25 later published cases cite this decision.
- The People v. Jin Cheng Lin (N.Y. 2016)
- People v. Johnson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. Ramos (N.Y. 2002)
- People v. Marinelli (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
- People v. Smith (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- People v. Dunbar (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- People v. Dunbar (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- People v. Nadal (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- People v. Esposito (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- People v. Brooks (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- People v. Jackson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- People v. Beckham (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
- People v. Hall (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- People v. Boardman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- People v. Dyla (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
- People v. Bowens (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- People v. Mosley (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- People v. Norris (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- People v. Wheeler (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- People v. Chambliss (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- People v. Klein (New York County Courts 1985)
- People v. Cooper (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- People v. Hopkins (N.Y. 1983)
- People v. Crosby (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
- People v. Hopkins (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1982)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order affirmed on the memorandum at the Appellate Division.
We would only add that unwarranted delay in arraignment is but one of the many pertinent factors bearing on the question of the voluntariness and, therefore, admissibility of a defendant’s inculpatory statements. (People v Vargas, 7 NY2d 555, 565-566; United States v Poole, 495 F2d 115, 120, cert den 422 US 1048.) Where, as in the case before us, there has been a voluntary and intelligent waiver by the defendant of his rights to counsel and to remain silent after he had been repeatedly advised of his constitutional rights, the statements made by the defendant were properly submitted to the trier of the facts to pass on the issue of the voluntariness of the inculpatory admissions. We reject defendant’s contention that his improperly postponed arraignment renders any statements made by him after his arrest involuntary as a matter of law.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.