People v. Bruckman
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Hamilton (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
- People v. Sanchez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- People v. Hankinson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- People v. Morris (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- People v. Roberts (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- People v. Barry (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- People v. Lee (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- People v. McDavis (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
- People v. Stahl (N.Y. 1981)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Inasmuch as defendant failed to object to the verdict as returned by the jury, his claim of repugnancy was not preserved for appellate review. (See People v Parks, 59 AD2d 543, 544; People v Incherchera, 56 AD2d 852; cf. Matter of Oliver v Justices of N. Y. Supreme Ct. of N. Y. County, 36 NY2d 53, 58; People v Quilles, 48 AD2d 933.)
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.