New York Court of Appeals, 1979

In re the Claim of Watz

In re the Claim of Watz
New York Court of Appeals · Decided February 8, 1979 · Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg Concur in Memorandum
46 N.Y.2d 876; 387 N.E.2d 611; 414 N.Y.S.2d 680; 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1827
In re the Claim of Watz

Cases that cite this one

16 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree that there is not substantial evidence in . the record to sustain the determination of the appeal board that the relationship between claimant and Equitable Life Assurance Society was that of employee-employer during the period January 1, 1974 through December 1, 1974.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.