MATTER OF RITTERSPORN v. Sadowski
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- MATTER OF HASKELL v. Gargiulo (N.Y. 1980)
- Matter of Fonvil v. Morse (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2019)
- Matter of Braunfotel v. Feiden (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2019)
- Bonner v. Negron (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- Harte v. Kaplan (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- Boyland v. Board of Elections (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- Napier v. Salerno (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1980)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
We have examined appellant’s challenges to the designating petition based on several specified grounds and find them to be without merit. In particular we reject his contention that the presumption of regularity which attaches to the acts of a commissioner of deeds as a public officer should be inapplicable as a matter of law to statements of a commissioner of deeds who is the candidate named in the designating petition on which his statements appear (see Election Law, § 6-132, subd 3).
Appellant’s general challenge to the petition grounded in principles of permeation in consequence of claimed irregularities or fraud or both presented questions of fact which, having been determined against appellant at Special Term and affirmed in the Appellate Division, are now beyond the scope of our review.
*620 Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.