MATTER OF SHEDLOCK v. Connelie
MATTER OF SHEDLOCK v. Connelie
48 N.Y.2d 943; 401 N.E.2d 217; 425 N.Y.S.2d 95; 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2548
Cases that cite this one
21 later published cases cite this decision.
- Mallia v. Connelie (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1980)
- Batista v. Kelly (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- Grossman v. McMahon (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
- Ressa v. County of Nassau (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1996)
- O'Shaughnessy v. New York State Division of State Police (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- Havern v. Senko (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- Arana v. Constantine (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- Frederick v. Civil Service Commission (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
- Lewis v. Chesworth (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- Mooney v. Superintendent of New York State Police (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- Faure v. Chesworth (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- Burke v. New York State Police (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- Wright v. Connelie (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- Gadway v. Connelie (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- Bruns v. Hanna (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- Zazycki v. City of Albany (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
- Lacey v. Coughlin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
- Reidy v. Connelie (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1981)
- MATTER OF SAUER v. Carey (N.Y. 1980)
- Economico v. Village of Pelham (N.Y. 1980)
- Reidy v. Connelie (New York Supreme Court 1980)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division (66 AD2d 433; see, also, Paul v Davis, 424 US 693).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.