Topper v. Mutual Life Insurance
Topper v. Mutual Life Insurance
46 N.Y.2d 974; 389 N.E.2d 142; 415 N.Y.S.2d 829; 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1892
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hardy v. Rose (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- Kuhn v. Kuhn (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (62 AD2d 932). In addition, the record does not support the contention that respondent made misleading representations to appellant regarding her entitlement to receive benefits under the salary continuation plan.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.