Belsky v. Lowenthal
Cases that cite this one
67 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Donald S. Engel, Engel & Engel v. Cbs, Inc., Moses & Singer, and Stanley Rothenberg (2d Cir. 1998)
- Taylor v. Metzger (N.J. 1998)
- Engel v. CBS INC. (District Court, S.D. New York 1997)
- Bridge C.A.T. Scan Associates v. Ohio-Nuclear Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 1985)
- Bandag of Springfield, Inc. v. Bandag, Inc. (Mo. Ct. App. 1983)
- Cosmas v. American Express Centurion Bank (District Court, D. New Jersey 2010)
- Chrysler Corp. v. Fedders Corp. (District Court, S.D. New York 1982)
- Schoolcraft v. City of New York (District Court, S.D. New York 2015)
- Rivera v. City of New York (District Court, S.D. New York 2005)
- Coan v. Tremont Advisors, Inc. (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 2001)
- Donald S. Engel, Engel & Engel v. Cbs, Inc., Moses & Singer, and Stanley Rothenberg (2d Cir. 1999)
- Chi Chao Yuan v. Rivera (District Court, S.D. New York 1999)
- Tarr v. Credit Suisse Asset Management, Inc. (District Court, E.D. New York 1997)
- O'Brien v. Alexander (2d Cir. 1996)
- O'Brien v. Alexander (2d Cir. 1996)
- O'BRIEN v. Alexander (District Court, S.D. New York 1995)
- Yeitrakis v. Schering-Plough Corp. (District Court, D. New Mexico 1992)
- Lacara v. Town of Islip (District Court, E.D. New York 1992)
- Hannah v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad (District Court, S.D. New York 1990)
- Sharma v. Skaarup Ship Management Corp. (District Court, S.D. New York 1988)
- Fizzinoglia v. Carrero (In re Carrero) (United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York 1988)
- Western Meat Co., Inc. v. IBP, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 1988)
- Donahue v. Pendleton Woolen Mills, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 1986)
- Fox v. Boucher (District Court, S.D. New York 1985)
- Cruz v. Triangle Affiliates, Inc. (District Court, E.D. New York 1983)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The first and third causes of action sounding in malicious prosecution were properly dismissed inasmuch as neither contains any allegation of interference with plaintiffs person or property (Drago v Buonagurio, 46 NY2d 778; Williams v Williams, 23 NY2d 592). The fourth cause of action, characterized by appellant in our court as alleging a claim for prima facie or intentional tort, was likewise properly dismissed by the Appellate Division for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Herbert B. Evans. (Cf. Drago v Buonagurio, supra; Fischer v Maloney, 43 NY2d 553, 557-558.)
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur in memorandum.
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.