People v. Schwimmer
Cases that cite this one
32 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Haji v. Miller (District Court, E.D. New York 2008)
- United States v. Lombardozzi (District Court, E.D. New York 1985)
- State v. Colon (Conn. 2001)
- People v. Sadacca (New York Supreme Court 1985)
- United States v. Wilson (District Court, S.D. New York 1983)
- People v. Barizone (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
- The People v. Kevin Fisher (N.Y. 2017)
- DOWDELL, KAREEM, PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- People v. Dowdell (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- People v. Finley (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- People v. Hilliard (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- People v. Washington (N.Y. 2007)
- People v. Caban (N.Y. 2005)
- People v. Harsit (New York Supreme Court 2002)
- People v. Oreckinto (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
- In re Backal (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1996)
- People v. Garcia (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1996)
- People v. Burdier (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- People v. Sanoguet (New York Supreme Court 1993)
- People v. Weatherspoon (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- People v. Jackson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- State v. Grullon (Conn. 1989)
- People v. Negri (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- People v. Macklowitz (New York Supreme Court 1987)
- People v. Chin (N.Y. 1986)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Rabin (66 AD2d 91) to which we add only that there cannot be any question concerning the intention of the Legislature by section 105.30 of the Penal Law to adopt the unilateral rather than the bilateral approach to conspiracy in light of the analogous statutory provisions contained in article 100 (criminal solicitation), article 110 (attempt), and article 115 (criminal facilitation) as well as article 105 (conspiracy) of the Penal Law.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.