Matter of Trinity Place Co. v. Fin. Adm'r of the City of New York
Matter of Trinity Place Co. v. Fin. Adm'r of the City of New York
51 N.Y.2d 890; 415 N.E.2d 978; 434 N.Y.S.2d 990; 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2890
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Tax Commission (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1981)
- Borough of Fort Lee v. Invesco Holding Corp. (New Jersey Tax Court 1981)
- MATTER OF CARRIAGE HOUSE MOTOR INN, INC. v. City of Watertown (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
- Farash v. Smith (N.Y. 1983)
- Barnum v. Srogi (N.Y. 1981)
- Farash v. Smith (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1981)
- Underbruckner Realty Corp. v. Tax Commission (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Cohen & Breslin Realty v. Board of Assessors (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- Johnson v. Collins (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- Manno v. Finance Administrator (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The issues in this case are factual. The determinations made at the Appellate Division conform to the weight of the evidence, and we perceive no error of law.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.