New York Court of Appeals, 1980

MATTER OF FALCONE v. New York State Educ. Dep't

New York Court of Appeals · Decided June 3, 1980 · Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer Concur in Memorandum

50 N.Y.2d 854; 407 N.E.2d 1335; 430 N.Y.S.2d 39; 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2424

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

Abraham v. Board of Regents (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
Magro v. Ambach (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
Ledo v. University of the State of New York, State Education Department (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
Friedman v. State Education Department (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
Robinson v. Board of Regents of the University (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1981)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed, *856 with costs, and the determination of the Board of Regents and the order of the Commissioner of Education reinstated.

Petitioner, a licensed optometrist, allowed an ophthalmic dispenser to fit contact lenses under his supervision in violation of section 7121 of the Education Law. As a result, petitioner was found guilty of two charges of professional misconduct, to wit: (1) permitting, aiding or abetting an unlicensed person to perform activities requiring a license (Education Law, § 6509, subd [7]); and (2) unprofessional conduct (Education Law, § 6509, subd [9]).

In light of the finding that petitioner carried on his practice of optometry in clear contravention of existing law, we cannot say that the penalty imposed by the Board of Regents — a 6-month period of actual suspension followed by an 18-month period of probation — is so disproportionate to petitioner’s offense as to mandate modification. (Schaubman v Blum, 49 NY2d 375; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222.)

Accordingly, the Appellate Division erred in modifying the penalty imposed.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.