New York Court of Appeals, 1980

Cohn v. Royal Globe Insurance

Cohn v. Royal Globe Insurance
New York Court of Appeals · Decided April 22, 1980
49 N.Y.2d 942; 406 N.E.2d 739; 428 N.Y.S.2d 881; 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2300
Cohn v. Royal Globe Insurance

Cases that cite this one

18 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*944OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Section 313 (subd 1, par [a]) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law provides expressly that insurance cancellation notices "shall include in type of which the face shall not be smaller than twelve point a statement that proof of financial security is required to be maintained”. In light of this statutory mandate, we cannot say that the arbitrator’s determination — that this statute does not contemplate substantial compliance — is so irrational as to require vacatur of the award. (Cf. Matter of Garcia v Federal Ins. Co., 46 NY2d 1040.)

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.