Allen v. Canadian General Electric Co.
Cases that cite this one
19 later published cases cite this decision.
- Ingraham v. Carroll (N.Y. 1997)
- Daniel Williams v. Beemiller, Inc. (N.Y. 2019)
- Williams v. Beemiller, Inc. (N.Y. 2019)
- Hamilton v. Accu-Tek (District Court, E.D. New York 1998)
- Bruce Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A. (2d Cir. 1990)
- Trotman v. Priority Auto, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
- Yoomi Babytech, Inc. v. Anvyl, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 2021)
- Sacco v. Reel-O-Matic, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
- Williams v. Beemiller, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation (District Court, S.D. New York 2005)
- Reynolds v. Aircraft Leasing, Inc. (New York Supreme Court 2002)
- Kelly v. MD Buyline, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 1998)
- Cortlandt Racquet Club, Inc. v. Oy Saunatec, Ltd. (District Court, S.D. New York 1997)
- Launer v. Buena Vista Winery, Inc. (District Court, E.D. New York 1996)
- Nippon Emo-Trans Co., Ltd. v. Emo-Trans, Inc. (District Court, E.D. New York 1990)
- Transistor Devices, Inc. v. Tracor, Inc. (District Court, E.D. New York 1987)
- Ronar, Inc. v. Wallace (District Court, S.D. New York 1986)
- Trafalgar Capital Corp. v. Oil Producers Equipment Corp. (District Court, S.D. New York 1983)
- Tonns v. Spiegel's (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1982)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice J. Clarence Herlihy at the Appellate Division, insofar as that opinion relates to the significance and effect of CPLR 302 (subd [a], par 3, cl [i]). We are not required to pass upon and thus do not address the significance and effect of CPLR 302 (subd [a], par 3, cl [ii]) (cf. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v Woodson, 444 US 286).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum. Question certified answered in the affirmative.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.