New York Court of Appeals, 1980

People v. Minori

People v. Minori
New York Court of Appeals · Decided November 13, 1980 · Cooke, Fuchsberg, Gabrielli, Jasen, Jones, Meyer, Wachtler
51 N.Y.2d 930; 415 N.E.2d 973; 434 N.Y.S.2d 985; 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2767
People v. Minori

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The affirmed finding that defendant’s room was not exclusively within his control is supported by sufficient evidence in the record and is therefore beyond our review (cf. People v Alexander, 37 NY2d 202). The contention that the defendant’s brother-in-law had no authority over the defendant’s room was not raised at the hearing and, having not been preserved, may not be considered on this appeal (cf. People v Tutt, 38 NY2d 1011).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum:

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.