Hannon v. Cuomo
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Yonkers Nissan, Inc. v. Adduci (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
- Alston v. New York City Transit Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
- Material Damage Adjustment Corp. v. Whelan (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
- Auto Dent Collision, Inc. v. Passidomo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- Crystal Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Foschio (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- Dunn Appraisal Co. v. Passidomo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- Allstate Insurance v. Foschio (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
- Little Reb Auto Corp. v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
- Dunn Appraisal Co. v. Foschio (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
- Government Employees Insurance v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
- Rustine v. Patterson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1981)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
On this record, there was substantial evidence to support the respondent’s conclusion. Nor can be it said that the penalty is shocking “to one’s sense of fairness” (Matter of Butterly & Green v Lomenzo, 36 NY2d 250, 256; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 223). It also appears that the notice and complaint served upon the appellant comported with the requirements of due process.
Judgment affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.