MATTER OF HOLBROOK v. State Ins. Fund
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Meyers v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- Kearney v. Coughlin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- MATTER OF BERGAMINI v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth. (N.Y. 1984)
- Miller v. Ravitch (N.Y. 1983)
- Bergamini v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
- Matter of Stanziale v. Executive Dep't, Office of Gen. Servs. (N.Y. 1981)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
On review of the record here, we cannot say that respondents’ termination of petitioner was for “a constitutionally impermissible purpose or in violation of statutory proscription” (James v Board of Educ., 37 NY2d 891, 892). Moreover, the petitioner produced no evidence that the director of administration, the same officer who signed petitioner’s letter of appointment, was not authorized to sign his letter of termination.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.