MATTER OF HERMAN v. Blum
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Kirk v. Hammock (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- Celestial Food Corp. of Coram, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- McKeon v. Brezenoff (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1982)
- Bradford v. Blum (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1982)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, without costs. There is substantial evidence to support the commissioner’s determination that petitioner’s failure to accept his work referral was without good cause (see Matter of Purdy v Kreisberg, 47 NY2d 354, 358). The asserted evidentiary errors have not been preserved for judicial review because of the absence of a specific objection or request for an adjournment to remedy the asserted defects (Matter of Sowa v Looney, 23 NY2d 329, 333; Matter of Leogrande v State Liq. Auth., 19 NY2d 418, 423).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.