People v. Martinez
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Baez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- People v. Watson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- People v. Younger (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- People v. Lozada (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- People v. Gilmore (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed. It cannot be ■ said the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant a continuance in the in camera hearing held to determine whether disclosure of the confidential informant was required. Where the defendant fails to establish the need for production, the trial court’s decision to end the in camera hearing on that issue does not deprive the defendant of his constitutional right to confrontation (see People v *725 Goggins, 34 NY2d 163, cert den 419 US 1012). We have examined defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.