People v. Cedeno
Cases that cite this one
18 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Makropoulos (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
- People v. Abidov (Khikmat) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
- People v. Russo (John) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York 2019)
- People v. Kuney (Michael) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- People v. Briggs (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- People v. Card (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- People v. Card (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- People v. Smith (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- People v. Dudley (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- People v. Peck (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- People v. Herriot (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- People v. Holt (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- People v. Robinson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- People v. Mazur (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
- People v. Udzinski (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- People v. Gooden (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- People v. Champelle (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
- People v. Hardy (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant’s only contention in our court is that the lapse of 13 months between his arrest and his arraignment on the indictment was an unreasonable delay in prosecution which constituted a denial of his constitutional right to due process in consequence of which his conviction should be reversed and the indictment dismissed (People v Singer, 44 NY2d 241; People v Staley, 41 NY2d 789). While defendant did make a motion to dismiss the indictment under CPL 30.30, he made no motion to dismiss based on the contention he now advances. In that circumstance he has failed to preserve that contention for our review (People v Lieberman, 47 NY2d 931).
*849 Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur; Chief Judge Cooke taking no part.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.