New York Court of Appeals, 1981

Freundlich v. Town Bd. of Southampton

Freundlich v. Town Bd. of Southampton
New York Court of Appeals · Decided February 10, 1981 · Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer Concur in Memorandum
52 N.Y.2d 921; 419 N.E.2d 342; 437 N.Y.S.2d 664; 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2158
Freundlich v. Town Bd. of Southampton

Cases that cite this one

10 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Appellate Division that the respondents violated the town ordinance by altering lot lines in an approved subdivision without following the mandated procedures. The lot lines on the revised plan under which the lots were to be sold were at variance with those on the first subdivision which was approved by the town planning board. It follows, therefore, that this attempted resubdivision is invalid (see Town of Southampton Rules and Regulations for Subdivision of Land, § 218, § 300 et seq.).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.