New York Court of Appeals, 1981

D'Amico v. Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance

D'Amico v. Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance
New York Court of Appeals · Decided February 19, 1981
52 N.Y.2d 1000; 420 N.E.2d 88; 438 N.Y.S.2d 290; 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2235

D'Amico v. Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs to Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance Company.

The homeowner’s policy issued by Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance Company, by its express terms, would cover Dennis Traína as an insured only if he were a resident of his parents’ household. Since the only evidence submitted by the parties establishes that Dennis did not actually reside in his parents’ household at the relevant time, summary judgment was properly granted.

*1002Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.