New York Court of Appeals, 1981

People v. Thill

New York Court of Appeals · Decided February 24, 1981

52 N.Y.2d 1020; 420 N.E.2d 95; 438 N.Y.S.2d 297; 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2251

Cases that cite this one

31 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

People v. Juhans (New York Supreme Court 1984)
People v. Bediako (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
People v. Mayo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
People v. Konieczny (N.Y. 2004)
People v. Benson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
People v. Scott (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
People v. Southwell (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
People v. Hedayat (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
People v. Hutchenson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
People v. Hickman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
People v. Dickson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
People v. Walton (New York Supreme Court 1987)
People v. Rullo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
People v. Kay (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
People v. Taylor (N.Y. 1985)
People v. Prescott (N.Y. 1985)
People v. Lawson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
People v. Pressley (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
People v. Kopciowski (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
People v. Fuentes (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
People v. Sharpe (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
People v. Sobotker (N.Y. 1984)
People v. Klaus (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
People v. Barber (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
People v. Campbell (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the case remitted to that court for a review of the facts.

By pleading guilty, defendant waived his statutory right to assert that he was entitled to dismissal because the People were not ready for trial within the time required by CPL 30.30. (See People v Clary, 52 NY2d 1023 [decided herewith] ; People v Friscia, 51 NY2d 845.) He cannot, therefore, test the validity of that claim on appeal.

*1022We reject defendant’s argument that the due process clauses of the Federal and State Constitutions require a contrary conclusion.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order reversed and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.