Westwood Associates v. Deluxe General, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Nasser v. Nasser (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- Rosenberg v. Stikeman Elliott, LLP (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- Broida v. Bancroft (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- Frontier Manufacturing, Inc. v. Comp-Aire Sys., Inc./Joy (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
- Katz v. NVF Co. (New York Supreme Court 1983)
- Brandon v. Chefetz (New York Supreme Court 1983)
- Stavredes v. United Skates of America, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1982)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action on grounds of forum non conveniens. That all of the parties to the action may have been New York residents is not dispositive, since the residence of the parties in New York is but one factor to be considered in determining whether an action should be dismissed pursuant to CPLR 327 (see Silver v Great Amer. Ins. Co., 29 NY2d 356; see, generally, Irrigation & Ind. Dev. Corp. v Indag, S. A., 37 NY2d 522).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.