New York Court of Appeals, 1981

Noia v. De Rosa

Noia v. De Rosa
New York Court of Appeals · Decided June 18, 1981
54 N.Y.2d 631; 425 N.E.2d 893; 442 N.Y.S.2d 504; 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2597
Noia v. De Rosa

Cases that cite this one

10 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We find no error of law in the charge to the jury given by the trial court, and the order of the Appellate Division should not be reversed on that ground.

Insofar as the determination of the Appellate Division to reverse the Trial Term’s order for a new trial and to *633reinstate the jury verdict was based on that court’s evaluation of the weight of the evidence it is not subject to our review (Donigi v American Cyanamid Co., 43 NY2d 935; Pfohl v Wipperman, 34 NY2d 597).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.