People v. Qualls
Cases that cite this one
40 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Cruz v. Scully (District Court, S.D. New York 1989)
- Barber v. Scully (District Court, S.D. New York 1983)
- Welch v. Bio-Reference Laboratories, Inc. (District Court, N.D. New York 2025)
- Hilts v. Ellis Hospital (District Court, N.D. New York 2024)
- Brown v. Voda Realty LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
- Brown v. UPS United Parcel Service Incorp. (District Court, N.D. New York 2023)
- People v. Williams (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- STATE OF NEW YORK v. MUENCH, KARL (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- People v. Krivoi (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- State v. Muench (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- People v. Herrera (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- People v. Blackman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- People v. Alvarado (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- Tamily v. General Contracting Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- People v. Materon (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- People v. Molling (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
- People v. Odiot (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
- People v. Johnson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
- People v. Rivera (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1996)
- People v. Farrell (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1996)
- People v. Montgomery (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- Rhoades v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- In re Charles K. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- People v. Thompson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- People v. McClane (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The defendant’s objection at trial was solely on the ground that the evidence constituted improper bolstering. That was insufficient to preserve for our review the contentions now advanced that the evidence constituted inadmissible hearsay and that its introduction violated the defendant’s constitutional right of confrontation (see People v Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 720, decided herewith). The other issues were either not preserved or are found to be without merit.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.