New York Court of Appeals, 1981

People v. Aleschus

New York Court of Appeals · Decided December 17, 1981

55 N.Y.2d 775; 431 N.E.2d 968; 447 N.Y.S.2d 243; 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3301

Cases that cite this one

21 later published cases cite this decision.

People v. Young (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
People v. Herschman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
People v. Adams (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
People v. Mendoza (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
Sluzar v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1996)
People v. Kretchmer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
People v. Balser (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
People v. Coico (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
People v. Cherena (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
People v. Brazeau (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
People v. Ayrhart (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
People v. Parham (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
People v. Hernandez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
People v. Vataj (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
People v. Graham (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
People v. Morales (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
People v. Morris (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
People v. Flores (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
People v. Torello (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
People v. Critzer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
People v. Walker (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1982)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

With respect to defendant’s sole contention on appeal, the failure of the trial court to instruct the jury as to the consequences in the event it found two witnesses to be accomplices, no request to charge was made and no exception to the court’s charge was taken. The alleged error therefore was not preserved and is beyond the review of this court.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.