People v. Gonzales
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Dennis (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- People v. Dawkins (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- People v. Rodriguez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- People v. Gonzalez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- People v. Cook (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- People v. Lee (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- People v. Glinsman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- People v. McClain (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- People v. Cyrus (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- People v. Carter (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- People v. Robinson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- People v. Baskerville (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1982)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant’s contention that the trial court committed reversible error in rereading its original charge on certain legal concepts after the jury had requested clarification of those concepts in “layman’s terms” is not properly preserved, as defendant failed to object or except to the trial court’s supplemental charge. Defendant’s failure to make his objection known at a time when the error, if any, could be remedied, precludes review by this court (People v Duncan, 46 NY2d 74, 80, cert den 442 US 910).
We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.