Matter of Thomas v. New York Temp. State Comm'n on Regulation of Lobbying
Cases that cite this one
28 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Hampton v. State of Michigan (Mich. Ct. App. 1985)
- Lowery v. Department of Corrections (Mich. Ct. App. 1985)
- Saumell v. New York Racing Ass'n, Inc. (District Court, E.D. New York 1985)
- Matter of Weinman v. New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs.Traffic Violations Bur. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
- Imburgia v. Procopio (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Imburgia v. Procopio (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Chenkin v. New York City Council (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- Frederick v. State (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 2009)
- Mickens v. State (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 2009)
- Rister v. City University (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 2008)
- Jattan v. Queens College of University of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Welch v. State (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- Craft v. State (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 2001)
- Kirk v. State of New York (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 2001)
- Singletary v. All Metro Aids, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
- Ferrer v. State (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 1996)
- Meyers v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- White v. State (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 1994)
- Zagarella v. State (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- Casillas v. Perales (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- Davis v. State (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- Treacy v. State (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 1986)
- Gittens v. State (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 1986)
- Bykofsky v. Hess (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- Lentlie v. Egan (N.Y. 1984)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Given the nature of the attorney-client relationship and petitioner’s position as associate counsel to respondent New York State Temporary Commission on Regulation of Lobbying, it cannot be said that reports of petitioner’s active assistance to two public interest lobbying groups regulated by the commission were an improper basis for the commission’s decision to terminate petitioner’s employment (cf. Arnett v Kennedy, 416 US 134; Cooper v Johnson, 590 F2d 559). Nor was petitioner entitled to a due *659 process hearing inasmuch as he never alleged that there was public dissemination of the reasons for his dismissal. Finally, petitioner, a nontenured employee, has demonstrated no procedural violation in the manner in which his employment was terminated.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.