BD. OF EDUC. OF TRI-VALLEY CENT. SCH. DIST. AT GRAHAMSVILLE v. Celotex Corp.
BD. OF EDUC. OF TRI-VALLEY CENT. SCH. DIST. AT GRAHAMSVILLE v. Celotex Corp.
58 N.Y.2d 684; 458 N.Y.S.2d 542; 444 N.E.2d 1006; 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3909
Cases that cite this one
17 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Lundin (N.Y. 1983)
- State v. Lundin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
- Mary Imogene Bassett Hospital v. Cannon Design, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- City of Binghamton v. Hawk Engineering P.C. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- Richards v. Passarelli (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- Town of Wawarsing v. Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- Frank v. Mazs Group, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. v. EnergyPro Construction Partners (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- Energy Services, Inc. v. EnergyPro Construction Partners (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- Hauppauge Union Free School District v. Lawrence L. Smith Associates, P. C. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- Methodist Hospital v. Perkins & Will Partnership (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- In re the Arbitration between Kohn Pederson Fox Associates & FDIC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- Williamsville Central School District v. Cannon Partnership (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
- Vogelsang v. McQuestion (New York Supreme Court 1987)
- Cabrini Medical Center v. Desina (N.Y. 1985)
- Chase Architectural Associates v. Moyers Corners Fire Department, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- Samaritan Hospital v. McManus, Longe, Brockwehl, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (88 AD2d 713).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.