New York Court of Appeals, 1982

Martinez v. Konczewski

New York Court of Appeals · Decided October 7, 1982

57 N.Y.2d 809; 441 N.E.2d 1117; 455 N.Y.S.2d 599; 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3719

Cases that cite this one

23 later published cases cite this decision.

Hemphill v. Hemphill (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
Yeo v. Cornaire (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
Schwartz v. Schwartz (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1982)
De Almeida v. Purtell (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
Clum v. Seksinsky (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
Wright v. Wright (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
Ladizhensky v. Ladizhensky (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
Sanders v. Sanders (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
Smith v. Finger (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
Porter v. Fryer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
Pecorello v. Snodgrass (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
Zaleski v. Zaleski (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
Paesch v. Paesch (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
Aldrich v. Aldrich (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
Morgano v. Morgano (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
Tavolacci v. Garges (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
Desmond v. Desmond (NYC Family Court 1986)
Savino v. Savino (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
Kozak v. Kozak (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
Cataldi v. Shaw (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
Jones v. Jones (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
Courten v. Courten (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
Klein v. Klein (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (85 AD2d 717). We read the memorandum as determining that it is in the best interests of the child that custody remain in the mother.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.