New York Court of Appeals, 1982

MATTER OF DYE v. New York City Transit Auth.

MATTER OF DYE v. New York City Transit Auth.
New York Court of Appeals · Decided October 19, 1982 · Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer Concur
57 N.Y.2d 917; 442 N.E.2d 1271; 456 N.Y.S.2d 760; 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3792
MATTER OF DYE v. New York City Transit Auth.

Cases that cite this one

31 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be hffirmed, with costs.

The determination upholding as against a claim of unconstitutionality the provision in the collective bargaining *920 agreement for arbitration of employee disciplinary grievances accords with the law of this State (Antinore v State of New York, 40 NY2d 921). With respect to the challenge to the arbitrator’s award on the merits, review under article 78 is not available (see CPLR 7511). Appellant’s claim based on the alleged failure of respondent to have reinstated him to his former position in accordance with the terms of the arbitration award is not within the scope of this proceeding as defined by the petition.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.