Matter of Gammerman v. Bd. of Elections of the City of New York

New York Court of Appeals
Matter of Gammerman v. Bd. of Elections of the City of New York, 57 N.Y.2d 888 (N.Y. 1982)
456 N.Y.S.2d 48; 442 N.E.2d 446; 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3766

Matter of Gammerman v. Bd. of Elections of the City of New York

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, without costs. We agree with the Appellate Division that the defect of late filing is not curable for the reasons assigned.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer. Judge Fuchsberg dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum: The drastic result in this case is the consequence of the harsh rule this court enunciated in such cases as Matter of Rutter v Coveney (38 NY2d 993) and Matter of Higby v Mahoney (48 NY2d 15). Reiterating the views I expressed in those cases, I would find an exception for the extraordinary circumstances which confront us now and reverse.

Reference

Full Case Name
In the Matter of Ira Gammerman Et Al., Appellants, v. Board of Elections of the City of New York Et Al., Respondents. Shirley Levittan Et Al., Proposed Intervenors-Respondents
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published